Democracy is at stake here, and it is pitted against the sensitive issue of reservation for women. The Women's Reservation Bill is set to be tabled in the Lok Sabha this month and looks good to be passed. The bill will radically change the way democracy works in India. Dedicating one-third of the seats in the Lok Sabha to women will be a slap on the face of all those people who fought for equality for all of India's citizens.
The Constitution was framed by a highly eminent team of intellectuals. They opposed segregation based on any aspect, religion/caste/gender. My reason for opposing the Bill is based on the fact that since the independence the status of women has only gone up; and if it wasn't needed then, there is no reason for it now.
The bill has the cunningness of male chauvinists written all over it. A case in point is this proposed change; 33% of Lok Sabha seats will be set aside for Women, for the remaining seats, women are free to contest and win elections. Nothing could be more out of tune to Indian democracy's plural orchestra. Hard-core feminists are pushing for this draconian law and this makes more moderate feminist betrayers.
The parody in the Indian society could not be more evident. Indian society is most certainly a male dominated one. (It is no where close to America, where a single woman can live at peace) But 2 women, placed at the right positions can pass this bill without much fuss. Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress party has already thrown her weight behind the bill. If she decides to get this bill into a law, there is very little Manmohan Singh can do to stop it. So from the political side things are done. The constitutional demands of passing this bill lie in the hands of the President, another woman, Prathiba Patil. If she signs at the right places, things are done. Add to this the fact that the President was hand-picked by Sonia Gandhi, and there looks like no stopping the bill this time.
India places herself rather uniquely in the world. It has chosen its own independent foreign policy, at a time when aligning with the United States would give more dividends. It has sincerely looked within for answers to the problems that plague it. The result of this is the unique nature of Indian democracy. In no other part of the world can you possibly find a land as divided as India, sticking together. But none of this can justify this unique nature of democracy it has decided to adopt. Division of elected bodies at State and National levels cannot be supported.
What makes my opposition to this bill so caustic is that it seems to be driven more out spite and less out of need. Keep elections unbiased. This model has worked well for the tougher part of the women's liberation movement. Don't hand out gifts to each man's better half and belittle their ability to make a lasting change on our future.
The Constitution was framed by a highly eminent team of intellectuals. They opposed segregation based on any aspect, religion/caste/gender. My reason for opposing the Bill is based on the fact that since the independence the status of women has only gone up; and if it wasn't needed then, there is no reason for it now.
The bill has the cunningness of male chauvinists written all over it. A case in point is this proposed change; 33% of Lok Sabha seats will be set aside for Women, for the remaining seats, women are free to contest and win elections. Nothing could be more out of tune to Indian democracy's plural orchestra. Hard-core feminists are pushing for this draconian law and this makes more moderate feminist betrayers.
The parody in the Indian society could not be more evident. Indian society is most certainly a male dominated one. (It is no where close to America, where a single woman can live at peace) But 2 women, placed at the right positions can pass this bill without much fuss. Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress party has already thrown her weight behind the bill. If she decides to get this bill into a law, there is very little Manmohan Singh can do to stop it. So from the political side things are done. The constitutional demands of passing this bill lie in the hands of the President, another woman, Prathiba Patil. If she signs at the right places, things are done. Add to this the fact that the President was hand-picked by Sonia Gandhi, and there looks like no stopping the bill this time.
India places herself rather uniquely in the world. It has chosen its own independent foreign policy, at a time when aligning with the United States would give more dividends. It has sincerely looked within for answers to the problems that plague it. The result of this is the unique nature of Indian democracy. In no other part of the world can you possibly find a land as divided as India, sticking together. But none of this can justify this unique nature of democracy it has decided to adopt. Division of elected bodies at State and National levels cannot be supported.
What makes my opposition to this bill so caustic is that it seems to be driven more out spite and less out of need. Keep elections unbiased. This model has worked well for the tougher part of the women's liberation movement. Don't hand out gifts to each man's better half and belittle their ability to make a lasting change on our future.